DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Buick Regal Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Regal

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeBuick
OmegaModelRegal
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
200 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2490 cc
131 HPPower152 HP
250 NmTorque208 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4940 mm
1785 mmWidth1845 mm
1455 mmHeight1440 mm
1605 KgWeight1520 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…