2000 • Nissan
Serena
Nissan Serena 2.5 TDi 16V (150 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Nissan Serena vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 TD (131 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Serena
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan SerenaSpecificationOpel Omega
NissanMakeOpel
SerenaModelOmega
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan SerenaSpecificationOpel Omega
13,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
170 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
280 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan SerenaSpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan SerenaSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan SerenaSpecificationOpel Omega
4520 mmLength4898 mm
1695 mmWidth1785 mm
1830 mmHeight1455 mm
1720 KgWeight1605 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Serena and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Serena leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…