DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeLand Rover
OmegaModelDiscovery
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
200 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
131 HPPower136 HP
250 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank95 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4710 mm
1785 mmWidth1860 mm
1455 mmHeight1890 mm
1605 KgWeight2020 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…