1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 TD (131 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
1998 Opel Omega vs 1998 GAZ 31 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • GAZ
31
GAZ 31 3110 2.3 (150 Hp) 1998Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
GAZ 31
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
OpelMakeGAZ
OmegaModel31
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
12,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
200 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
131 HPPower150 HP
250 NmTorque206 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
4785 mmLength4870 mm
1785 mmWidth1800 mm
1450 mmHeight1422 mm
1605 KgWeight1400 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Opel Omega and 1998 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…