DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 GAZ 31 vs 1998 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
GAZMakeOpel
31ModelOmega
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
13,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
173 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
206 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
4870 mmLength4785 mm
1800 mmWidth1785 mm
1422 mmHeight1450 mm
1400 KgWeight1605 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 GAZ 31 and 1998 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…