1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.5 TD (131 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.5/100
1998 Opel Omega vs 1998 Ford Windstar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Ford
Windstar
Ford Windstar 3.0 V6 (152 Hp) 1998Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Ford Windstar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Windstar
OpelMakeFord
OmegaModelWindstar
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Windstar
12,0 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
131 HPPower152 HP
250 NmTorque252 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Windstar
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank95 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Windstar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFord Windstar
4785 mmLength5125 mm
1785 mmWidth1915 mm
1450 mmHeight1790 mm
1605 KgWeight1810 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase3066 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Opel Omega and 1998 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…