DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
OpelMakeVolvo
OmegaModel940
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
12,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2849 cc
131 HPPower147 HP
250 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,8 lt
8 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears3
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 940
4785 mmLength4871 mm
1785 mmWidth1750 mm
1450 mmHeight1411 mm
1605 KgWeight1475 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…