DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi Cabriolet vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeOpel
CabrioletModelOmega
1994Model year1994
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
133 HPPower131 HP
186 NmTorque250 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
10 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4785 mm
1716 mmWidth1785 mm
1379 mmHeight1450 mm
1370 KgWeight1605 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi Cabriolet and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…