DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1994 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
OmegaModelCedric
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed199 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
131 HPPower160 HP
250 NmTorque248 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption14,2 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8 ltAverage consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4800 mm
1785 mmWidth1745 mm
1450 mmHeight1410 mm
1605 KgWeight1560 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1994 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…