DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
OpelMakeGAZ
OmegaModel31
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
10,5 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
210 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2287 cc
144 HPPower150 HP
205 NmTorque211 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationGAZ 31
4898 mmLength4960 mm
1776 mmWidth1820 mm
1455 mmHeight1476 mm
1535 KgWeight1500 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…