DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
GAZMakeOpel
31ModelOmega
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
13,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
175 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2287 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower144 HP
211 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
4960 mmLength4898 mm
1820 mmWidth1776 mm
1476 mmHeight1455 mm
1500 KgWeight1535 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…