DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Opel Omega vs 2001 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

57.25–56.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeLand Rover
OmegaModelDefender
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h18,8 s
195 km/hTop speed130 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
280 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank93 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,8 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4599 mm
1776 mmWidth1790 mm
1545 mmHeight2059 mm
1730 KgWeight2055 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2794 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Opel Omega and 2001 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…