DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Land Rover Defender vs 2001 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

56.75–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeOpel
DefenderModelOmega
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,8 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
130 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
300 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
93 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
10,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4599 mmLength4898 mm
1790 mmWidth1776 mm
2059 mmHeight1545 mm
2055 KgWeight1730 Kg
2794 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Land Rover Defender and 2001 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…