2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI 16V (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationSaab 9-3
OpelMakeSaab
OmegaModel9-3
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationSaab 9-3
13,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
120 HPPower130 HP
280 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4898 mmLength4629 mm
1776 mmWidth1711 mm
1545 mmHeight1428 mm
1730 KgWeight1295 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…