2000 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI 16V (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationOpel Omega
SaabMakeOpel
9-3ModelOmega
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationOpel Omega
11,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
130 HPPower120 HP
177 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationOpel Omega
4629 mmLength4898 mm
1711 mmWidth1776 mm
1428 mmHeight1545 mm
1295 KgWeight1730 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…