2002 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI (120 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 25
OpelMakeRover
OmegaModel25
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 25
12,5 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
240 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
120 HPPower113 HP
280 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 25
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationRover 25
4898 mmLength3990 mm
1776 mmWidth1688 mm
1455 mmHeight1419 mm
1670 KgWeight1130 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Omega and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…