DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Omega
MGMakeOpel
ZSModelOmega
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Omega
9,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
193 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
113 HPPower120 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationOpel Omega
4520 mmLength4898 mm
1700 mmWidth1776 mm
1390 mmHeight1455 mm
1225 KgWeight1670 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…