DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Omega vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMG ZS
OpelMakeMG
OmegaModelZS
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMG ZS
12,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
240 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
120 HPPower113 HP
280 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMG ZS
DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMG ZS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMG ZS
4898 mmLength4520 mm
1776 mmWidth1700 mm
1455 mmHeight1390 mm
1670 KgWeight1225 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Omega and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…