DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Opel Omega vs 1991 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 929
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModel929
1991Model year1991
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 929
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
100 HPPower145 HP
158 NmTorque231 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 929
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 929
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 929
4770 mmLength4690 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1480 mmHeight1425 mm
1265 KgWeight1420 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Opel Omega and 1991 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…