1991 • Volvo
850
Volvo 850 2.0 (143 Hp) 1991Overall Score61.5/100
1991 Volvo 850 vs 1991 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1991 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i CAT (100 Hp) 1991Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo 850SpecificationOpel Omega
VolvoMakeOpel
850ModelOmega
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeEstate
4+1Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo 850SpecificationOpel Omega
240 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2000 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower100 HP
0 NmTorque158 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo 850SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo 850SpecificationOpel Omega
—Length4770 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1480 mm
—Weight1265 Kg
—Wheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1991 Volvo 850 and 1991 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…