1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (122 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 100
OpelMakeAudi
OmegaModel100
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 100
10,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
200 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
175 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 100
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationAudi 100
4740 mmLength4790 mm
1760 mmWidth1777 mm
1445 mmHeight1437 mm
1232 KgWeight1430 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2692 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…