1992 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (122 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Omega
AudiMakeOpel
100ModelOmega
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Omega
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
191 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
168 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Omega
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationOpel Omega
4790 mmLength4740 mm
1777 mmWidth1760 mm
1437 mmHeight1445 mm
1430 KgWeight1232 Kg
2692 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…