1996 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Opel Omega vs 1996 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationFiat Croma
OpelMakeFiat
OmegaModelCroma
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationFiat Croma
13,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
115 HPPower94 HP
172 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption6 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationFiat Croma
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationFiat Croma
4785 mmLength4520 mm
1785 mmWidth1760 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1460 KgWeight1240 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Opel Omega and 1996 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…