1996 • Volkswagen
Sharan
Volkswagen Sharan 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Volkswagen Sharan vs 1996 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0i (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationOpel Omega
VolkswagenMakeOpel
SharanModelOmega
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationOpel Omega
16,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
172 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
235 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationOpel Omega
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen SharanSpecificationOpel Omega
4620 mmLength4785 mm
1810 mmWidth1785 mm
1730 mmHeight1450 mm
1665 KgWeight1460 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volkswagen Sharan and 1996 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…