1998 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.0 DTI 16V (101 Hp) 1998Overall Score56.25/100
1998 Opel Omega vs 1998 Land Rover Discovery Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Land Rover
Discovery
Land Rover Discovery 2.0i (111 Hp) 1998Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Land Rover Discovery
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
OpelMakeLand Rover
OmegaModelDiscovery
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
15,0 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
186 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
101 HPPower111 HP
205 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank89 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
4785 mmLength4524 mm
1785 mmWidth1810 mm
1450 mmHeight1960 mm
1540 KgWeight2020 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Opel Omega and 1998 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…