DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda MX-6 vs 1998 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
MX-6ModelOmega
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
204 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
115 HPPower101 HP
170 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14 88 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength4785 mm
1750 mmWidth1785 mm
1310 mmHeight1450 mm
1120 KgWeight1540 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda MX-6 and 1998 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…