1987 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 1.8i (115 Hp) 1987Overall Score53.25/100
1987 Opel Omega vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1990Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationGeo Storm
OpelMakeGeo
OmegaModelStorm
1987Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationGeo Storm
13,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationGeo Storm
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationGeo Storm
4740 mmLength4150 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1300 mm
1235 KgWeight1010 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1987 Opel Omega and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…