DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Meriva vs 2002 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Meriva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
MerivaModelAD
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h—
178 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4042 mmLength4370 mm
1694 mmWidth1695 mm
1624 mmHeight1475 mm
1455 KgWeight1130 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Meriva and 2002 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Meriva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…