DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Borgward BX7 vs 2016 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Borgward BX7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Borgward BX7SpecificationAudi Q3
BorgwardMakeAudi
BX7ModelQ3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Borgward BX7SpecificationAudi Q3
—0–100 km/h6,4 s
206 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1981 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
224 HPPower220 HP
300 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Borgward BX7SpecificationAudi Q3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Borgward BX7SpecificationAudi Q3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7 S tronic
235/60 R18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Borgward BX7SpecificationAudi Q3
4715 mmLength4388 mm
1911 mmWidth1831 mm
1690 mmHeight1608 mm
1740 KgWeight1565 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Borgward BX7 and 2016 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Borgward BX7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…