DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Bora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolkswagen
Q3ModelBora
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
220 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/65 R16; 235/55 R17; 235/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4388 mmLength4562 mm
1831 mmWidth1793 mm
1608 mmHeight1468 mm
1385 KgWeight1285 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2614 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Bora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…