2016 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 1.4 TFSI (125 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.25/100
2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 TP (140 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo MiTo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q3SpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
AudiMakeAlfa Romeo
Q3ModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors3
Performance
Audi Q3SpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
10,8 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
194 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
125 HPPower140 HP
220 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q3SpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi Q3SpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 235/55 R17; 235/50 R18Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi Q3SpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
4388 mmLength4063 mm
1831 mmWidth1720 mm
1608 mmHeight1446 mm
1385 KgWeight1170 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…