DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Frontera vs 1996 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
FronteraModelTerrano
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

18,6 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
153 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2410 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
125 HPPower100 HP
195 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption12,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
13,3 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/80 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4692 mmLength4105 mm
1764 mmWidth1735 mm
1753 mmHeight1805 mm
—Weight1730 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Frontera and 1996 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…