DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Campo vs 1996 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
CampoModelFrontera
1996Model year1996
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,3 s0–100 km/h18,6 s
140 km/hTop speed153 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
100 HPPower125 HP
226 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption13,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4980 mmLength4692 mm
1690 mmWidth1764 mm
1710 mmHeight1753 mm
3025 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Campo and 1996 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…