2012 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 2.0 CDTI (135 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Opel Combo vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda CX-5
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda CX-5
11,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
179 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
135 HPPower160 HP
320 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda CX-5
4390 mmLength4555 mm
1831 mmWidth1840 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1710 mm
—Weight1488 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Opel Combo and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSVolkswagen Multivan vs Opel Combo2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota RAV4 vs Opel Combo2012 and 2012 model years
VSMercedes-Benz Viano vs Opel Combo2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda CX-5 vs Opel Combo2012 and 2012 model years
VSProton Preve vs Opel Combo2012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…