2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 2.0 CDTI (135 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
CX-5ModelCombo
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationOpel Combo
10,5 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
197 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
160 HPPower135 HP
208 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationOpel Combo
4555 mmLength4390 mm
1840 mmWidth1831 mm
1710 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1488 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2755 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Scirocco vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Forester vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Mondeo vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…