DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelTrafic
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
155 km/hTop speed138 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
75 HPPower82 HP
165 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank90 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4782 mm
1685 mmWidth1904 mm
1800 mmHeight1940 mm
1260 KgWeight1791 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…