2003 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DTI 16V (75 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Renault Kangoo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Kangoo
Renault Kangoo 1.6i 16V (95 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Renault Kangoo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelKangoo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
15,5 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
155 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower95 HP
165 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
4320 mmLength3995 mm
1685 mmWidth1663 mm
1800 mmHeight1827 mm
1260 KgWeight1180 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…