DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel323
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
15,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
155 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower98 HP
165 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
4320 mmLength4290 mm
1685 mmWidth1705 mm
1800 mmHeight1420 mm
1260 KgWeight1070 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…