DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Fiat Stilo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Stilo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFiat
ComboModelStilo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
155 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
75 HPPower95 HP
165 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4516 mm
1685 mmWidth1756 mm
1800 mmHeight1570 mm
1260 KgWeight1235 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Fiat Stilo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Stilo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…