DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Combo vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
ComboModelXsara
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
155 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
75 HPPower88 HP
165 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4257 mm
1685 mmWidth1751 mm
1800 mmHeight1637 mm
1260 KgWeight1240 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Combo and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…