DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Opel Combo vs 1999 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
ComboModelMicra
2001Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
147 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
65 HPPower57 HP
130 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/60R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength3695 mm
1685 mmWidth1585 mm
1800 mmHeight1430 mm
1260 KgWeight900 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Opel Combo and 1999 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…