DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Nissan Micra vs 2001 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
MicraModelCombo
1999Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
146 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1527 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
57 HPPower65 HP
95 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3695 mmLength4320 mm
1585 mmWidth1685 mm
1430 mmHeight1800 mm
900 KgWeight1260 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Nissan Micra and 2001 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…