2004 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 CDTI (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Opel Combo vs 2004 Nissan AD Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
AD
Nissan AD 1.8 i (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationNissan AD
OpelMakeNissan
ComboModelAD
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationNissan AD
12,5 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
100 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationNissan AD
4322 mmLength4370 mm
1684 mmWidth1695 mm
1801 mmHeight1475 mm
1295 KgWeight1130 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Opel Combo and 2004 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…