DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2004 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeOpel
TrackerModelCombo
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,5 s
150 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
97 HPPower100 HP
133 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank52 lt
14 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4322 mm
1630 mmWidth1684 mm
1650 mmHeight1801 mm
1235 KgWeight1295 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chevrolet Tracker and 2004 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…