2005 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CNG (94 Hp) 2005Overall Score50.25/100
2005 Opel Combo vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationFord C-Max
OpelMakeFord
ComboModelC-Max
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationFord C-Max
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
165 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
94 HPPower100 HP
133 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationFord C-Max
Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationFord C-Max
4322 mmLength4330 mm
1684 mmWidth1820 mm
1801 mmHeight1600 mm
1295 KgWeight1234 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Opel Combo and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…