2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score51.25/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2005 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CNG (94 Hp) 2005Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationOpel Combo
FordMakeOpel
C-MaxModelCombo
2004Model year2005
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationOpel Combo
12,9 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
175 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower94 HP
145 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationOpel Combo
4330 mmLength4322 mm
1820 mmWidth1684 mm
1600 mmHeight1801 mm
1234 KgWeight1295 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2716 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2005 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…