DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Combo vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10 points.

52.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeVolkswagen
ComboModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeMinivan, Kombi
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
158 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
95 HPPower102 HP
95 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4878 mm
1831 mmWidth1793 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1831 mm
—Weight1587 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Combo and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…