DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 MG MG3 vs 2016 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MG3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

52.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG MG3SpecificationOpel Combo
MGMakeOpel
MG3ModelCombo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG MG3SpecificationOpel Combo
10,4 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
108 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
106 HPPower95 HP
137 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG MG3SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG MG3SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/75 R14; 195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG MG3SpecificationOpel Combo
4018 mmLength4390 mm
1729 mmWidth1831 mm
1507 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1125 KgWeight—
2520 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 MG MG3 and 2016 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…