2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CDTI (95 Hp) 2016Overall Score52.25/100
2016 Opel Combo vs 2016 MG MG3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • MG
MG3
MG MG3 1.5 VTI-TECH (106 Hp) 2016Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
MG MG3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
52.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationMG MG3
OpelMakeMG
ComboModelMG3
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationMG MG3
14,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
158 km/hTop speed108 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
95 HPPower106 HP
95 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationMG MG3
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationMG MG3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/75 R14; 195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationMG MG3
4390 mmLength4018 mm
1831 mmWidth1729 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1507 mm
—Weight1125 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Opel Combo and 2016 MG MG3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG MG3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…