2016 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.6 CDTI (105 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
2016 Opel Combo vs 2016 Kia Niro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Kia
Niro
Kia Niro 1.6 GDI (141 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Niro
OpelMakeKia
ComboModelNiro
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Niro
13,4 s0–100 km/h—
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
290 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Niro
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationKia Niro
4390 mmLength4355 mm
1831 mmWidth1800 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1535 mm
2755 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Opel Combo and 2016 Kia Niro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…